and the ḥadīth has a corroborating report that is mawqūf, narrated by al-Aʿmash from Ibrāhīm that ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb said regarding the mutual imprecators: once they have invoked curses, they are to be separated and never reunited. It was recorded by ʿAbd al-Razzāq and al-Bayhaqī. I said: Its narrators are reliable, but it is disconnected between Ibrāhīm—who is al-Nakhaʿī—and ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb. If you understand what has been mentioned, the ḥadīth is valid for use as evidence that the separation due to mutual imprecation is an annulment. This is the view of al-Shāfiʿī, Aḥmad, and others, while Abū Ḥanīfah held that it is an irrevocable divorce, and the ḥadīth refutes him. Mālik, al-Thawrī, Abū ʿUbaydah, and Abū Yūsuf also adopted this view, and it is the truth that is necessitated by sound reasoning regarding the wisdom behind their separation, as explained by Ibn al-Qayyim, may Allāh have mercy on him, in "Zād al-Maʿād," so refer to it (4/151 and 153-154). This view is also inclined towards by al-Ṣanʿānī in "Subul al-Salām" (3/241).

- "He would not recite the Qurʾān in less than three days." It was recorded by Ibn Saʿd in "al-Ṭabaqāt" (1/376): Yūsuf ibn al-Gharaq narrated to us, al-Ṭayyib ibn Sulaymān informed us, ʿAmrah narrated to us, she said: I heard ʿĀʾishah (raḍiya Allāhu ʿanhā) say: and she mentioned it. It was also recorded by Abū Shaykh in "Akhlaq al-Nabī ﷺ" (p. 280-281) through another chain from Yūsuf ibn al-Gharaq. I said: This isnād has weakness, as Yūsuf, about whom Ibn Abī Ḥātim said (4/2/227-228): "I asked my father about him? He said: He is not strong. I heard my father say: Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal said: