and this portion of it was attributed by al-Suyūṭī to al-Ṭayālisī only, which was insufficient. Al-Munāwī made a grave error in his criticism, saying: "He indicated its goodness, and it includes Abū al-Ashʿath, whom al-Dhahabī mentioned in 'al-Ḍuʿafāʾ,' saying: He is Jaʿfar ibn al-Ḥārith, a Kufan who settled in Wāsiṭ, and they considered him weak!" But al-Munāwī was mistaken, for this Abū al-Ashʿath is actually al-Ṣanʿānī, as explicitly stated in Muslim's narration, and as known from the narration of Abū Qilābah from him, among other sources, and his name is Sharāḥīl ibn Ādah. Then al-Munāwī overlooked in 'al-Taysīr' his critique of al-Suyūṭī's grading, and he asserted that its isnād is good! !(lā yaʿḍuhu): meaning he does not accuse it of (al-ʿaḍīhah), which is slander and falsehood.

- "A flogged adulterer does not marry except someone like him." It was recorded by Abū Dāwūd (1/321), al-Ḥākim (2/166 and 193), and Aḥmad (2/324) from ʿAmr ibn Shuʿayb from Saʿīd al-Maqburī from Abū Hurayrah, raised [to the Prophet]. In a narration by al-Ḥākim through the route of Ḥabīb al-Muʿallim, it is said: A man from the people of Kūfah came to ʿAmr ibn Shuʿayb and said: Are you not amazed that al-Ḥasan says: A flogged adulterer does not marry except a flogged woman like him? ʿAmr said: And what amazes you? Saʿīd al-Maqburī narrated to us from Abū Hurayrah from the Prophet ﷺ and ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAmr used to proclaim this." He said: "The isnād is authentic," and al-Dhahabī agreed with him, and it is as they said. His statement: "the flogged" al-Shawkānī (6/124) said: This description is given in the context of the prevalent case, considering those from whom adultery has become apparent. It provides evidence that it is not permissible for a woman to marry someone from whom adultery has become apparent, and likewise, it is not permissible for a man to marry someone from whom it has become apparent