al-Ṭaḥāwī disagreed with the Ḥanafīs on this issue, as he dedicated a special chapter to it in his book "Sharḥ al-Maʿānī" (2/314-317), where he mentioned the ḥadīths related to its permissibility and dislike—except for this ḥadīth, which he did not include—then he concluded the chapter by saying: "Thus, by verifying these reports, it is established that there is no harm in eating the lizard, and this is our stance." Whoever desires further details should refer to it. There is also supporting evidence for the ḥadīth from the narration of Yūsuf ibn Muslim al-Muṣīṣī: Khālid ibn Yazīd al-Qasrī informed us, Muḥammad ibn Sūqah informed us, from Saʿīd ibn Jubayr, from ʿĀʾishah, in a marfūʿ form. It was recorded by Ibn ʿAsākir in "al-Tārīkh" (5/284/2). I say: This isnād is weak. Khālid ibn Yazīd al-Qasrī—who was the governor of Iraq—, Ibn ʿAdī said: "His ḥadīths are not followed, neither in isnād nor in matn... and he is weak in my view." Abū Ḥātim said: "He is not strong." And I do not know Yūsuf ibn Muslim al-Muṣīṣī. Then it became clear that he was attributed to his grandfather, and he is Yūsuf ibn Saʿīd ibn Muslim, who was deemed trustworthy by Ibn Abī Ḥātim and Ibn Ḥibbān (9/281), and it was mentioned that he died in the year (265). (Note): The ḥāfiẓ only limited himself to declaring the isnād of Abū Dāwūd as ḥasan because its narrators are trustworthy, except for Ḍamḍam ibn Zarʿah, the teacher of Ismāʿīl ibn ʿAyyāsh, who has slight weakness, as indicated in his statement in "al-Taqrīb": "Truthful, but makes mistakes." And Allāh knows best.