"its chain of transmission is authentic according to the conditions of Muslim, but they did not include it, and ʿAbd Allāh ibn Wahb ibn Zamʿah is well-known." al-Dhahabī critiqued it by saying: "This was only recorded by Ibn Mājah, and then it is a second error by al-Ḥākim, for Ibn Zamʿah did not narrate from Tamīm al-Dārī, and the correct name is ʿAbd Allāh ibn Muwahib." I said: As long as he is trustworthy—as previously mentioned by the ḥāfiẓ, and similarly al-Dhahabī's statement in "al-Kāshif": "truthful," and it is established that he heard from Tamīm in the preceding narrations—the chain of transmission is authentic, or at least ḥasan. Therefore, there is no basis for criticizing it for discontinuity due to his use of ʿanʿanah or inserting some narrators—Qabīṣah—between him and Tamīm, as it is known that this narration contradicts the narration of the group, and Ibn Muwahib was not accused of tadlīs, so the default is to consider his narration as connected, especially since he explicitly stated hearing! When his narration is combined with the ḥadīth of Abū Umāmah through the route of Muʿāwiyah, the ḥadīth reaches the level of authenticity. And Allāh knows best. 3 - As for the ḥadīth of Rāshid, it is narrated by al-Aḥwaṣ ibn Ḥakīm from him with an addition: "he inherits from him and takes responsibility for him." It was recorded by Saʿīd ibn Manṣūr (no. 601). And this al-Aḥwaṣ is weak in memory, so he is used as supporting evidence. In its meaning is the report of ʿUmar (raḍiya Allāhu ʿanhu) that a man came to ʿUmar and said: A man accepted Islam at my hands, then died and left a thousand dirhams, and I felt uneasy about them, so I brought them to you. He said: What if he had committed an offense, who would be responsible? He replied: I would be. He said: Then his inheritance is yours. It was recorded by Ibn Abī Shaybah (11/409/11623) with a weak chain.