It was recorded by al-ʿUqaylī in "al-Ḍuʿafāʾ" (325), al-Kharāʾiṭī in "Masāwīʾ al-Akhlāq" (vol. 2, p. 5, no. 2), Ibn ʿAdī (272/2), Ibn Shādhān al-Azjī in "al-Fawāʾid al-Muntaqāh" (1/118/2), Ibn Bishrān in "al-Amālī" (144-145), Ibn al-Aʿrābī in "Muʿjamuh" (82/1), and through him al-Quḍāʿī (42/2), Abū al-Qāsim al-Mahrānī in "al-Fawāʾid al-Muntakhabah" (3/23/1), and also al-Bayhaqī from Quṭbah ibn al-ʿAlāʾ al-Ghanawī from his father from Hishām. Al-ʿUqaylī said: "al-ʿAlāʾ ibn al-Minhāl is not corroborated in this, and it is not known except through him, and it is not authentic in the chapter with an isnād; it is a statement of ʿĀʾishah." Thus he said, and its occurrence from various routes as a marfūʿ strengthens its elevation, but with the wording of the translation. Ibn ʿAdī and al-Bayhaqī criticized it due to Quṭbah ibn al-ʿAlāʾ, saying: "He is not strong." His father al-ʿAlāʾ was mentioned by Ibn Ḥibbān in "al-Thiqāt"! He was followed by Ibn al-Mubārak from Hishām ibn ʿUrwah with a wording similar to the translation. It was recorded by Abū Nuʿaym in "al-Ḥilyah" (8/188) from Sahl ibn ʿAbd Rabbih who narrated to us from Ibn al-Mubārak, and he said: "It is rare from the ḥadīth of Hishām with this wording." And I did not find anyone who translated Sahl ibn ʿAbd Rabbih. Sufyān contradicted him, narrating it from Hishām as mawqūf. It was recorded by al-Tirmidhī (2/67). Then it was recorded by him and ʿAbd al-Ghanī al-Maqdisī in "al-Tawakkul" (245/2) from Ibn al-Mubārak from ʿAbd al-Wahhāb ibn al-Ward from a man from the people of Madīnah who said: