Ismāʿīl ibn Jaʿfar, and in his biography, al-Bukhārī included this ḥadīth, without mentioning any criticism or endorsement. Ibn Abī Ḥātim did the same (4/2/134), but he did not include the ḥadīth and mentioned that Ismāʿīl ibn Jaʿfar narrated from him, which might be an error. Ibn Ḥibbān mentioned him in "al-Thiqāt" (7/596). Then al-Bukhārī mentioned that Ḥātim ibn Ismāʿīl narrated from Yaḥyá ibn Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Labībah from his grandfather from the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) something similar. And Yaḥyá ibn Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān... I did not recognize him, and it is possible that it is a typographical error and the correct version is from Yaḥyá from Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān... and Yaḥyá is Ibn Jaʿfar ibn Abī Kathīr himself mentioned in the first path. Al-Bukhārī's purpose is to show that Ḥātim ibn Ismāʿīl differed from Sharīk ibn Abī Namr in his isnād, saying: from Yaḥyá from Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Labībah from his grandfather. And Sharīk said: from Yaḥyá from Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Abī Labībah from al-Qāsim from ʿĀʾishah. And Allāh knows best. The ḥadīth has a supporting narration reported by Muḥammad ibn Zayd ibn al-Muhājir ibn Qunfudh from his father from Umm Salamah, elevated [to the Prophet]. It was recorded by al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Awsaṭ" (1/24/1) and he said: "It is not narrated from Umm Salamah except through this isnād." I said: al-Mundhirī said in "al-Targhīb" (1/135): "Its isnād is good." He said this, but it is contradicted by al-Haythamī's statement (2/34): "It was narrated by al-Ṭabarānī in 'al-Awsaṭ', and its narrators are those of the authentic collections except for Zayd ibn al-Muhājir, as Ibn Abī Ḥātim did not mention anyone narrating from him except his son Muḥammad ibn Zayd." I said: However, it is an acceptable supporting narration for the ḥadīth of ʿĀʾishah, so the ḥadīth is ḥasan with their combination