in this world)? - He said: No one has asked me before you since I asked the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) about it, and he said: No one has asked me about it before you. It is... and he mentioned it. I said: This isnād is good, its narrators are trustworthy, the narrators of the two Shaykhs [al-Bukhārī and Muslim], except that they only included ʿĀṣim as a corroborative narrator, but al-Aʿmash corroborated him from Abū Ṣāliḥ, though they differed regarding its isnād. It was recorded by Aḥmad (6/445 and 452) and al-Ṭaḥāwī in "Mushkil al-Āthār" (3/47), as well as by Ibn Jarīr, who elaborated on the chains of transmission to it. He and Aḥmad (5/315) and Ibn al-Jawzī in "Jāmiʿ al-Masānīd" (folio 79/2) also recorded a corroborative narration from ʿUbādah ibn al-Ṣāmit similar to it. Its narrators are trustworthy, the narrators of the two Shaykhs, except that in some of its narration by Ibn Jarīr, it suggests a disconnection between Abū Salamah ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān and ʿUbādah, but he has another chain from ʿUbādah, so the ḥadīth is authentic with all these chains. Ibn Jarīr (11/94) has another corroborative narration from Abū Hurayrah, raised [to the Prophet] with the wording: "A good dream is glad tidings, seen by the believer, or seen for him." Its isnād is good, and it is recorded by Muslim (7/52, 53) in two separate chains from him, one of them being the chain of Ibn Jarīr.

- "Before the Hour, there will be transformation, swallowing up, and pelting." It was recorded by Ibn Mājah (4059) from Sayyār from Ṭāriq from ʿAbd Allāh from the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam). I said: This isnād is acceptable for corroborative evidence, its narrators are trustworthy, the narrators of Muslim except for this Sayyār, who is Abū Ḥamzah al-Kūfī, mentioned by Ibn Ḥibbān in "al-Thiqāt" and narrated from by a group. Al-Būṣīrī criticized it in "al-Zawāʾid" (folio 272/1) for a disconnection between Sayyār and Ṭāriq, but this is nothing because he based it on the assumption that this Sayyār is Abū al-Ḥakam, which is not the case, yes, it was Bashīr ibn..