and the other: that the one who disagrees here—if we consider him a dissenter—is Saʿīd ibn Abī Burdah. He is a trustworthy and reliable narrator, accepted by the group, so attributing the disagreement to al-Mughīrah ibn Abī al-Ḥurr is not applicable at all. I believe that what Saʿīd ibn Abī Burdah narrated from his father is a different ḥadīth than the one narrated by Thābit and others from him, due to the difference in the wording of the ḥadīth on one hand, and because his narration includes something not found in their narration from him on the other hand, which is his saying: "The Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) came while we were sitting." Therefore, I consider the ḥadīth authentic, as all its narrators are trustworthy and reliable. As for what is mentioned in "al-Mīzān" by al-Dhahabī, Khanjī edition (3/190), in the biography of this al-Mughīrah after the ḥadīth: "I said, and the isnād to him is questionable." It is a typographical or transcription error, and the correct statement by al-Dhahabī is that it pertains to another isnād he mentioned in the biography of Mughīrah ibn al-Ḥasan al-Hāshimī following this biography, and the correct version is found in the Ḥalabī edition of al-Mīzān (4/159).

"Indeed, a man from the people of the Fire will be enlarged in the Fire until a molar of his is like Mount Uḥud." It was recorded by Aḥmad (4/366) through the route of Abū Ḥayyān al-Taymī who narrated to me from Yazīd ibn Ḥayyān al-Taymī.... and Zayd (ibn Arqam) narrated to us, and he mentioned it, and it is elevated but he did not explicitly state its elevation. I said: And this isnād is authentic according to the conditions of Muslim. It has a corroborating narration from Abū Saʿīd al-Khudrī, elevated with a similar meaning. It was recorded by Ibn Mājah (2/587) through the route of Muḥammad ibn Abī Laylá from ʿAṭiyyah al-ʿAwfī from him