in the first [is] Saʿīd ibn Ziyād, who is unknown. And Saʿīd ibn Abī Hilāl is trustworthy but had become confused. The second is mursal from ʿUmar ibn ʿAlī ibn Ḥusayn according to al-Bukhārī's narration, and he is truthful and virtuous. Or from the mursal of ʿAlī ibn ʿUmar ibn Ḥusayn according to Abū Dāwūd's narration, and he is obscure as in "Taqrīb," and perhaps the first is more correct, as Aḥmad also reported it (3/355) similar to al-Bukhārī's narration. The third includes Sharāḥbīl, who is Ibn Saʿd al-Madanī, a client of the Anṣār. Al-Ḥāfiẓ said: "Truthful but became confused in his later years." From this aspect, Aḥmad also reported it (3/355). There is a fourth path narrated by Muḥammad ibn Isḥāq from Muḥammad ibn Ibrāhīm from ʿAṭāʾ ibn Yasār from Jābir ibn ʿAbd Allāh, elevated [to the Prophet], similar to it. It was reported by Aḥmad (3/306), al-Bukhārī in "al-Adab" (1234), Ibn Khuzaymah in "Ṣaḥīḥ" (1/256/2), Ibn Ḥibbān (1996), and al-Ḥākim (1/445 and 4/283-284) who said: "Authentic according to the conditions of Muslim." Al-Dhahabī agreed with him. I said: Ibn Isḥāq was only reported by Muslim as a follow-up, and he is a mudallis and has narrated it with ʿanʿanah. In summary, all four paths of the ḥadīth are defective, but the ḥadīth, with all of them combined, is strong and reaches the level of authenticity. And Allāh knows best.

"O Abū Fāṭimah! Increase in prostration, for there is no Muslim who prostrates to Allāh in a single prostration except that Allāh raises him by a degree (in Paradise and removes a sin from him)." It was reported by Aḥmad (3/428) and Ibn Saʿd (7/508) through the path of Ibn Lahīʿah who narrated to us