"from Abū Bakrah, who reached the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) while he was bowing before joining the row. He mentioned this to the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam), who said: 'May Allāh increase your eagerness, but do not repeat it.'" So, dear reader, compare this wording with the one presented there; you will find that my statement: "And its origin is in 'Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī'..." is correct and precise, which I have learned from practicing this noble science. There are two additions there that are not in al-Bukhārī, along with a difference in its context from him, which are: the first is Abū Bakrah's walking to the row. The second is his (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) saying: "Who among you bowed before the row and then walked to the row?" Therefore, the ḥāfiẓ in "al-Fatḥ" (2/268) attributed these two additions to Abū Dāwūd and others. So, did the deluded one speak the truth when he said: "The ḥadīth in its entirety and its letters are in al-Bukhārī"? And who is the one causing confusion?! I leave the judgment to the readers, and may Allāh send blessings upon Muḥammad, who said: "If you feel no shame, then do as you wish!" There is another person who has recently afflicted the people and the Islamic library, about whom the well-known proverb "He became a raisin before he was a sour grape" applies; like the one before him, but he differs in his style. That one casts doubt on the sunnah by attacking the person of al-Albānī and accusing him of deficiencies and ignorance! This one pretends to praise al-Albānī and appreciate his knowledge, but he directly attacks the sunnah by weakening the authentic ḥadīths that the scholars have authenticated