(2/905/9) from Salamah ibn Ṣafwān ibn Salamah al-Zuraqī, from Yazīd ibn Ṭalḥah ibn Rukānah, who raised it to the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) and mentioned it. this does not disrupt that because it is another isnād and it is mursal, rather it serves as supporting evidence for the connected isnād and is acceptable. And Yazīd ibn Ṭalḥah was mentioned by Ibn Abī Ḥātim (4/2/273) without any criticism or endorsement, but al-Suyūṭī said in "Isʿāf al-Mubṭīʾ": "He was a Companion." The second: from Suwayd ibn Saʿīd, who narrated to us from Ṣāliḥ ibn Mūsá al-Ṭalḥī, who narrated to us from Qatādah from Anas with it. It was recorded by Ibn Bishrān in "al-Amālī" (155/1). I say: This isnād is very weak, Ṣāliḥ ibn Mūsá al-Ṭalḥī is abandoned as stated in "al-Taqrīb." And Suwayd ibn Saʿīd is weak, and Ibn Maʿīn severely criticized him. As for the ḥadīth of Ibn ʿAbbās, it is narrated by Saʿīd ibn Muḥammad al-Warrāq, who narrated to us from Ṣāliḥ ibn Ḥassān from Muḥammad ibn Kaʿb from him, raised with it. It was recorded by al-Kharrāʾiṭī, al-ʿUqaylī in "al-Ḍuʿafāʾ" (187), Ibn ʿAdī in "al-Kāmil" (198/1), and Abū Nuʿaym in "al-Ḥilyah" (3/220). Al-ʿUqaylī said: "Ṣāliḥ ibn Ḥassān, al-Bukhārī said: 'His ḥadīth is rejected,' and in this there is a narration from another aspect that is also weak."