and Shuʿbah also followed him from Qatādah with it and said: "the seat of the devil." It was recorded by al-Shāfiʿī. The ḥadīth was authenticated by Aḥmad and Ibn Rāhawayh, as al-Marwazī said in "Masāʾil ʿanhumā" (p. 223): "I said: Is it disliked for a man to sit between the shade and the sun? He said: (meaning Aḥmad) This is disliked, is it not forbidden? Isḥāq said: The prohibition from the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) has been authenticated." The ḥadīth has a supporting narration reported by Miqdām ibn Dāwūd, narrated to us by ʿAbd Allāh ibn Muḥammad ibn al-Mughīrah, narrated to us by Sufyān al-Thawrī, narrated to us by Muḥammad ibn al-Munkadir from Jābir as a marfūʿ ḥadīth with it. It was recorded by Ibn ʿAdī in "al-Kāmil" (221/2) and he said: "I do not know anyone who narrates it from al-Thawrī except ʿAbd Allāh ibn Muḥammad, and most of his ḥadīths are not followed up by others, and despite his weakness, his ḥadīth is written." I said: He is accused of fabricating, so his testimony is not to be rejoiced in! Moreover, the narrator from him, Miqdām ibn Dāwūd, is very weak. There is a better supporting narration than his, reported by Abū al-Munīb from Ibn Buraydah from his father as a marfūʿ ḥadīth with it, except for the phrase: "the seat of the devil." It was recorded by Ibn Mājah (3722). I said: Its isnād is good as al-Būṣīrī said in "al-Zawāʾid" (Q 249/1-2).