I said: this wording is, in my view, anomalous or objectionable, as it contradicts the narration of the group from Ibn Abī Fudayk in the previous wording, which included ʿUmar alongside Abū Bakr, contrary to this. I have not found its isnād to al-Muṭṭalib to determine whether it is anomalous or objectionable. As for the ḥadīth (Ḥal), I did not see it in "Fihris al-Ḥilyah," but al-Munāwī mentioned that in its isnād is al-Walīd ibn al-Faḍl, and al-Dhahabī said in "al-Mīzān": "Ibn Ḥibbān said: he narrates fabrications," then he mentioned a ḥadīth and said: it is false. In "al-Lisān": "al-Ḥākim, Abū Nuʿaym, and Abū Saʿīd al-Naqqāsh said: he narrated fabrications from the Kufans."