and I have found for him two other corroborators: the first is Abū ʿAlī ʿUthmān ibn Jaʿfar, who narrated to us from Muḥammad ibn Jaḥādah with some rearrangement. It was recorded by al-Ḥākim (4/409) who said: "All of its narrators are trustworthy, except for this ʿUthmān ibn Jaʿfar, for I do not know him to be reliable or criticized." I said: Al-Ḥāfiẓ mentioned it in "al-Lisān" with this ḥadīth and al-Ḥākim's statement about it, and he added nothing except that he said: It is a rejected ḥadīth. As for al-Dhahabī, he did not mention it in "al-Mīzān," but in "al-Talkhīṣ" he said: "I said: it is this, and it is weak." He refers to the following corroboration: the second is Ghazāl ibn Muḥammad from Muḥammad ibn Jaḥādah with the omission of the day when Ayyūb was relieved and the day he was afflicted, and the rest is the same. It was recorded by Ibn ʿAsākir in "Juzʾ Akhbār al-Qurʾān" (Q 5/1) and al-Ḥākim (4/211) through routes from Abū al-Khaṭṭāb Ziyād ibn Yaḥyá al-Ḥassānī who narrated to us from Ghazāl ibn Muḥammad. And he said: "All of its narrators are trustworthy except for Ghazāl ibn Muḥammad, for he is unknown; I do not know him to be reliable or criticized." Al-Dhahabī concurred. And he said in "al-Mīzān": "He is unknown and his report is rejected in cupping." and I found for Ibn Jaḥādah corroborators: