from Qatādah from him with it as marfūʿ. It was recorded by al-Tirmidhī and Abū Yaʿlá in "his Musnad" (3/769) and by al-Ḍiyāʾ al-Maqdisī in "al-Mukhtārah" (205/1), and by al-Rūyānī in "his Musnad" (240/2). al-Tirmidhī said: "This is a gharīb ḥadīth. Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl said: This ḥadīth is not authentic, nor is the ḥadīth of Maʿmar from ʿAmmār Abū ʿAmmār from Abū Hurayrah." I said: The men of this [chain] are trustworthy, the men of the two Shaykhs, except for Sulaymān al-Raqī, who is truthful but not strong as in "al-Taqrīb," so someone like him is suitable for corroboration, especially since it has been narrated from other than his route from Anas. Al-Haythamī mentioned it in "al-Majmaʿ" (5/139) and said: "It was narrated by al-Bazzār, and in it is ʿAnbasah ibn Sālim. Al-Bazzār said: 'We do not know him to have been followed up on this,' and Abū Dāwūd weakened him." I said: And this ʿAnbasah is not in the first route, so perhaps he narrated it with another isnād from Anas. And Allāh knows best. Then what I hoped for was confirmed, for I saw it in "Zawāʾid al-Bazzār" (p. 171) from the route of this ʿAnbasah from ʿUbayd Allāh ibn Abī Bakr from Anas. And the rest of its men are trustworthy. As for the ḥadīth of Jābir, it was recorded by Abū Dāwūd (2/187) from the route of Abū al-Zubayr from him as marfūʿ. Its men are trustworthy, so it is authentic except for the ʿanʿanah of Abū al-Zubayr, although Muslim has recorded dozens of aḥādīth from his narration from Jābir with ʿanʿanah from other than the route of al-Layth from him, so it is in any case a good witness, especially since al-Nawawī said in "his Riyāḍ": Its isnād is ḥasan. As al-Munāwī transmitted in "al-Fayḍ": And the summary of the matter is that the ḥadīth with all its routes is authentic without doubt, and all praise is due to Allāh, by whose grace righteous deeds are completed