it was recorded by Ibn Ḥibbān in his "Ṣaḥīḥ" (1/574/2311- Mawārid) through the route of Ibn Wahb as well: ʿAmrū ibn al-Ḥārith informed me... Ibn Salm is ʿAbd Allāh ibn Muḥammad al-Maqdisī, the teacher of Ibn Ḥibbān in this ḥadīth, and he is trustworthy. The other referred to is Ibn Lahīʿah, as explicitly stated in the narration of al-Fasawī and Ibn ʿAsākir mentioned before. It was also recorded by al-Ṭabarānī (no. 4925) and Ibn ʿAsākir from ʿAmrū ibn al-Ḥārith alone. So you see, dear reader, that these three: Yaḥyá ibn Ayyūb, ʿAbd Allāh ibn Lahīʿah, and ʿAmrū ibn al-Ḥārith, agreed on narrating the ḥadīth from Yazīd ibn Abī Ḥabīb with its authentic chain that is undisputed. Even if we assumed they were all weak in memory, anyone with a whiff of this noble knowledge would not hesitate to authenticate their ḥadīth by applying the principle of strengthening the ḥadīth with follow-ups and various routes. How then, when all three are trustworthy as detailed earlier?! How then, when it has been authenticated by the aforementioned imams?! I sincerely hope that this research and investigation will be considered by those emerging individuals who hastily respond to me for an error they perceive, filling pages and composing treatises, presenting to people crude responses lacking knowledge, and the example is right before you. And if this is the state of this virtuous shaykh, then what would be the state of his grandson named "Khālid al-Muʾadhdhin" in his work titled "Establishing the Proof on the Weakness of the ḥadīth (Seek help in fulfilling needs by keeping them secret), and in it a response to the scholar Shaykh Nāṣir al-Dīn al-Albānī"? He mentioned in his introduction (p. 17) that he presented it to a group he named, the most notable of whom, at best, is unknown and not renowned in this field, among them the virtuous shaykh, and he mentioned that he is his maternal grandfather, and he said about him: