and the other: ʿAbd Allāh ibn Naṣr: Wakiʿ narrated it to us. Ibn ʿAdī included it in "al-Kāmil" (p. 223/1): ʿUmar ibn Sinān al-Manbijī narrated to us, ʿAbd Allāh ibn Naṣr narrated it to us. He said: "This is not preserved from Wakiʿ from al-Aʿmash; rather, Mālik ibn Saʿīr narrates it from al-Aʿmash." meaning that it is not preserved from Wakiʿ from al-Aʿmash in this connected form, but rather Mālik ibn Saʿīr narrates it from al-Aʿmash in a connected form. However, its coming from the two previous paths from Wakiʿ in a connected form strengthens the narration of this Ibn Naṣr. Accordingly, Mālik ibn Saʿīr would have followed him in connecting it, and his narration would favor the connected narration from Wakiʿ over the disconnected narration from him, and Allāh knows best. It was also included by Ibn al-Aʿrābī in "Muʿjamuh" (p. 247/2), Abū ʿUrubah al-Ḥarrānī in "Ḥadīthuh" (p. 98/1), Ibn al-Ḥammāmī in "Juzʾ Mukhtār min Masmūʿātih" (p. 35/1), al-Rāmahurmuzī in "al-Amthāl" (p. 21/1), al-Ḥākim in "al-Mustadrak," al-Qaḍāʿī in "Musnad al-Shihāb" (p. 96/1), and Ibn ʿAsākir in "Tārīkh Dimashq" (2/97/1) through the path of Abū al-Khaṭṭāb Ziyād ibn Yaḥyá al-Ḥassānī who narrated to us, Mālik ibn Saʿīr narrated to us, al-Aʿmash narrated from Abū Ṣāliḥ from Abū Hurayrah. Ibn al-Ḥammāmī said: "Mālik ibn Saʿīr uniquely narrated it in an elevated form from al-Aʿmash, while Wakiʿ narrated it from al-Aʿmash from Abū Ṣāliḥ in a suspended form." Thus he said, but he actually means it is disconnected as previously mentioned in the narration of Ibn Saʿd, and also, the suspension in such a ḥadīth is not conceivable, as is apparent