and al-Dāraqutnī, and Abū Ḥātim said, "In the beginning of his affair, he was upright, then he became confused before his death. He was asked, 'What do you say about him?' He replied, 'He is nothing,' and he rejected his ḥadīths from Abū al-Ashʿath." Al-Jawzjānī said, "I fear that his ḥadīths are fabricated." As for Ibn ʿAdī, he said, "I hope there is no harm in him!" As for the ḥadīth of Ibn ʿUmar, it was recorded by Ibn ʿAdī (295/1) and from him by al-Sahmī in "Tārīkh Jurjān" (315) through the route of Muḥammad ibn Faḍl from Karz ibn Wabarah from ʿAṭāʾ from him, reported as elevated without mentioning the stars. Ibn ʿAdī said, "Most of Muḥammad ibn Faḍl's ḥadīths are not corroborated by reliable narrators." I said: He is Ibn ʿAṭiyyah, and al-Fallas said: A liar. Al-Bukhārī greatly weakened him and said, "They remained silent about him." As for Karz ibn Wabarah, al-Sahmī provided a long biography (295-316) and listed many ḥadīths from his narration from ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿUmar, al-Rabīʿ ibn Khaytham, Ṭāwūs, Nuʿaym ibn Abī Hind, ʿAṭāʾ ibn Abī Rabāḥ, Mujāhid, and Abū Ayyūb, and said, "He was known for his asceticism and worship."