the first: the reliability of those who elevated it; they are more numerous and more trustworthy. the second: the choice of the author of "al-Ṣaḥīḥ" for the elevated narration in his book. Then I found a supporting narration for the ḥadīth: narrated by Ibn ʿAsākir (10/77) through the route of Juwaybir from al-Ḍaḥḥāk from Ibn ʿAbbās as elevated... he mentioned it with its meaning. I said: Juwaybir is among the well-known but abandoned interpreters! He is very weak.

(While I was at a well drawing water from it; Abū Bakr and ʿUmar came to me. Abū Bakr took the bucket and drew one or two buckets, and in his drawing there was weakness, and may Allāh forgive him! Then Ibn al-Khaṭṭāb took it from Abū Bakr's hand, and it transformed in his hand into a large bucket, and I did not see a genius among the people who could do what he did, and he drew until the people were satisfied.) It came from the narration of Ibn ʿUmar, Abū Hurayrah, and Abū al-Ṭufayl. As for the narration of Ibn ʿUmar; it was narrated from him by two: the first is Sālim - his son: narrated by al-Bukhārī in (3633, 3682, and 7020), Muslim (7/113), al-Tirmidhī (2289), al-Nasāʾī in "al-Kubrā" (7636), Aḥmad in "his Musnad" (2/28 and 39) and in "al-Faḍāʾil" (224), Ibn Abī Shaybah (11/62 and 12/21), al-Bayhaqī (8/154), Abū Yaʿlá (5514 and 5524), al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Muʿjam al-Kabīr" (13177), and Ibn Abī ʿĀṣim (1456) through two routes from Sālim from him with it