it was connected by al-Tirmidhī (4004), Aḥmad (4/125), al-Ṭabarānī (7175-7178), and Abū Nuʿaym also ... mentioning a man from the tribe of Ḥanẓalah between them. The Ḥanẓalī, I did not recognize him, and see my commentary on "al-Mishkāt" (995). I have found a supporting narration for it, but it is very weak, so I mention it to clarify its condition, and I say: It was narrated by Ismāʿīl ibn ʿAmr al-Bajalī: Mūsá ibn Muṭayr narrated to us from Abū Isḥāq who said: al-Barāʾ ibn ʿĀzib said to me: Shall I not teach you a supplication that the Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) taught me? He said: ... and he mentioned it. It was produced by al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Muʿjam al-Kabīr" (2/9-10), and in "al-Awsaṭ" (2/156/2/7542), and from his route: Abū Nuʿaym in "Akhbār Aṣbahān" (2/27), and al-Ṭabarānī said: "This ḥadīth was not narrated from Abū Isḥāq except by Mūsá ibn Muṭayr, and it was solely transmitted by Ismāʿīl ibn ʿAmr." I said: This is weak, and his teacher Mūsá; al-Dhahabī said: "He is weak, Yaḥyá ibn Maʿīn declared him a liar, and Abū Ḥātim, al-Nasāʾī, and a group said: He is abandoned ...". And al-Haythamī criticized it, saying (10/173): "It was narrated by al-Ṭabarānī in 'al-Kabīr' and 'al-Awsaṭ', and in it is Mūsá ibn Muṭayr who is abandoned." And Abū Isḥāq—who is al-Sabīʿī—had become confused, but the defect is from those below him. And in the ḥadīth of Shaddād—especially from the first route—there is sufficient evidence without needing to rely on this weak isnād.