doubted the raising of the last sentence and said: "I do not know whether it is part of the ḥadīth or if Ibn Sīrīn said it." It was recorded by Muslim (7/52). Maʿmar followed him from Ayyūb with the mentioned doubt; except that he rearranged, placing the third sentence in the sixth position. It was recorded by ʿAbd al-Razzāq in "al-Muṣannaf" (11/211-212), and through his route: by Muslim, al-Ḥākim (4/390), and Aḥmad (2/369), and al-Ḥākim said: "Its isnād is authentic and they did not record it!" Thus he said! He erred in his critique of the two Shaykhs; as for Muslim, it is obvious, and as for al-Bukhārī, it will be explained. Perhaps for this reason, al-Dhahabī attributed it in "al-Talkhīṣ" to the two Shaykhs and was correct. Sufyān ibn ʿUyaynah followed him from Ayyūb with part of it, narrated by Ibrāhīm ibn Bishār al-Ramādī from him with the first three sentences and the sixth one as mawqūf. It was recorded by Ibn Ḥibbān in "Ṣaḥīḥ" (7/614/6008 - al-Iḥsān). Al-Ḥumaydī said in "Musnad" (484/1145): Sufyān narrated to us only the fifth sentence, and said: "Let him pray two rakʿahs!" adding: "two rakʿahs," which is anomalous—unless it was inserted by some scribes; as it does not appear in any of the ḥadīth routes according to my knowledge, including the forthcoming route