its origin is in "Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī" in an extended form (5466) from the second perspective in a similar manner, and it has many paths from Anas in "the two Ṣaḥīḥs" and others, and one of them has been previously extracted under ḥadīth (3148). 5- Page 1131, under ḥadīth (2963): Then the book "Ṣalāt ʿalá al-Nabī ﷺ" by Ibn Abī ʿĀṣim was published in the year (1415) edited by our brother Ḥamdī al-Salafī, and I saw the ḥadīth in it as previously mentioned by the narration of al-Daylamī from him, except that it appeared in it in place of (... Ibn Azhar) (... Ibn Zāhir), whom I did not recognize, but it is possible that he is (Muḥammad ibn Zāhir, the nephew of Khaythamah Zuhayr ibn Ḥarb), as he is from this generation, and he was mentioned by Ibn Abī Ḥātim, al-Khaṭīb (5/289), and Ibn ʿAsākir (15/327). If it is him, then the isnād is good, as the rest of its men are trustworthy, despite some weakness in some of them. Then Ibn Abī ʿĀṣim said (54/70): Abū Yaḥyá Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥīm narrated to us: Ḥusayn ibn Muḥammad narrated to us: Shaybān narrated from Qatādah from Anas ibn Mālik from Abū Ṭalḥah in a marfūʿ form with the wording of the ḥadīth (of Abū al-ʿAwām) mentioned earlier (p. 1126); without the phrase: "For I am only a messenger from the messengers." And it was narrated by Ibn Abī Ḥātim from his teacher ʿAlī ibn al-Ḥusayn ibn al-Junayd: Abū Bakr al-Aʿyan and Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥīm - Ṣāʿiqah - said: Ḥusayn ibn Muḥammad narrated it. As in "Tafsīr Ibn Kathīr" (4/25). I said: This isnād is authentic, its men are trustworthy, men of the two Shaykhs, and Ḥusayn ibn Muḥammad is Ibn Bahrām al-Tamīmī al-Marwazī, and Shaybān is Ibn ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Naḥwī, so the ḥadīth is authentic and all praise is due to Allāh