(Note) The ḥāfiẓ made an error in this ḥadīth when he said in "al-Fatḥ" (10/33): "It was reported by Ibn al-Sunnī and Abū Nuʿaym in 'ʿAmal al-Yawm wa-al-Laylah' through the route of ʿUthmān ibn Muṭar from Thābit with the wording: (he mentioned the ḥadīth and said:) and ʿUthmān is weak." He mentioned it following the ḥadīth of Jaʿfar ibn Sulaymān from Thābit—meaning from Anas—with a more complete context than this, but it does not include the wording of peace. It is referenced earlier under ḥadīth (1278), then the ḥāfiẓ said after what I quoted from him: "and ʿUthmān is weak." I say: The ḥāfiẓ erred in two aspects: the first is that this ʿUthmān is not in the isnād of Ibn al-Sunnī. The other is his reliance on this and Abū Nuʿaym for the extraction of the ḥadīth, neglecting to attribute it to Ibn Abī Shaybah and Aḥmad, whose isnāds are free from weakness, which is not befitting of the (ḥāfiẓ)! Furthermore, the ḥadīth meets the criteria of "Majmaʿ al-Zawāʾid" by al-Haythamī, but he did not include it, and perhaps the reason is that its origin is in the "Ṣaḥīḥayn" through another route from Thābit from Anas, and I do not think this excuses him for omitting it. And Allāh knows best.

"The Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) forbade the use of nabīdh in jars." It was recorded by al-Nasāʾī in "al-Sunan al-Kubrā" (4/189/6836), Aḥmad (3/66), and al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Muʿjam al-Awsaṭ" (1/112/1/2246) through various routes from Hishām ibn Ḥassān from Ibn Sīrīn from Abū al-ʿĀliyah who said: Abū Saʿīd al-Khudrī was asked about nabīdh in jars? He said: and he mentioned it