and some of which are good due to other factors, and clings to a weak, objectionable narration, which is this narration of Abū Bakr according to Isḥāq. However, this has been narrated from him in another version that agrees with the narration of the group, which is more authentic than his first disconnected narration. Maʿmar narrated from ʿAbd Allāh ibn Abī Bakr ibn Muḥammad ibn ʿAmr ibn Ḥazm from his father from his grandfather ʿAmr ibn Ḥazm who said: "Gabriel came and prayed with the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam)..." the ḥadīth does not mention the number of rakʿahs. It was narrated by Isḥāq ibn Rāhwayh in "his Musnad" as in "Naṣb al-Rāyah" (1/225) and "al-Maṭālib al-ʿĀliyah" (Q 9/2) through the route of ʿAbd al-Razzāq, and this is in "al-Muṣannaf" (1/534) but there is a gap in its isnād. Al-Ḥāfiẓ said afterwards in "al-Maṭālib" also: "This isnād is good, except that Muḥammad ibn ʿAmr ibn Ḥazm did not hear from the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) due to his young age, so if the pronoun in 'his grandfather' refers to 'Abū Bakr,' it depends on the hearing of Abū Bakr from ʿAmr." I said: it is explicitly from his grandfather—as you see—so it is disconnected because (Muḥammad ibn ʿAmr) did not meet him, but it is authentic due to its preceding supporting evidences, as there is nothing objectionable in it unlike the first narration of Abū Bakr. Another instance of deception by al-Ghumārī, may Allāh guide him, he said after his previous ḥadīth from Abū Masʿūd which includes the objectionable number of rakʿahs: "It was narrated by al-Bayhaqī in 'al-Maʿrifah' through the route of Ayyūb ibn ʿUtbah: Abū Bakr ibn ʿAmr ibn Ḥazm narrated to us from ʿUrwah ibn al-Zubayr from Ibn Abī Masʿūd al-Anṣārī from his father." I said: the aspect of his deception on the readers is from two angles: first: he remained silent about its isnād, giving the impression that there is nothing in it and that al-Bayhaqī did not comment