"truthful but with some weakness." Abū Muʿāwiyah al-Ḍarīr, who is trustworthy, also followed them in "Musnad Ibn Rāhwayh" (3/933-934), but he did not mention Masrūq in it. Part of it is in "Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī" (3935), "Abū ʿAwānah" (2/28), and Ibn Rāhwayh (2/107/31) through the route of Maʿmar from al-Zuhrī from ʿUrwah from ʿĀʾishah, in a shortened form with the wording: "The prayer was prescribed as two rakʿahs, then the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) migrated, so it was prescribed as four, and the travel prayer was left as it was initially." It is agreed upon without mentioning the migration, and it is recorded in "Ṣaḥīḥ Abū Dāwūd" (1082). As for the supporting evidence, in "al-Maṭālib al-ʿĀliyah al-Musnadah" by al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar (Q 25/2): "Isḥāq (1): I said to Abū Usāmah: Did Saʿd ibn Saʿīd al-Anṣārī narrate to you that he heard al-Sāʾib ibn Yazīd say: The prayer was prescribed as two prostrations, two prostrations: Ẓuhr and ʿAṣr, so they used to pray two rakʿahs after Ẓuhr and two rakʿahs after ʿAṣr, then it was prescribed for them to pray Ẓuhr as four and ʿAṣr as four, so they abandoned that when it was prescribed for them, and the travel prayer remained [as two rakʿahs], and the resident prayer was four? He confirmed it and said: Yes." The ḥāfiẓ said: "This is a good ḥadīth."