"and Abū Ḥamzah is Isḥāq ibn al-Rabīʿ, who narrates from al-Ḥasan, a Basran." In "al-Muqtaná" by al-Dhahabī (26/1): "Abū Ḥamzah al-ʿAṭṭār: Isḥāq ibn al-Rabīʿ." He is among the men mentioned in "al-Tahdhīb," and in "al-Taqrīb": "Isḥāq ibn al-Rabīʿ al-Baṣrī al-Abalī - with the hamzah having a ḍammah and the lām being emphasized - Abū Ḥamzah al-ʿAṭṭār, trustworthy, though spoken about due to his views on predestination, from the seventh [generation]." In summary, this narration, despite its broken chain, has a weakness that does not undermine the previous connected narration, whose flaw is the use of 'ʿanʿanah' as we mentioned. I only mentioned this mursal [narration] to prefer the word (knowledge) over the word (oppression). I have found a supporting narration from Siyar, from ʿAbd Allāh ibn Masʿūd, from the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam): "Before the Hour, there will be exclusive greetings, widespread trade until a woman assists her husband in trade, severing of family ties, false testimony, concealing true testimony, and the prevalence of the pen." It was narrated by al-Bukhārī in "al-Adab al-Mufrad" (1049) and Aḥmad (1/407) with a sound isnād, its men are trustworthy, the men of Muslim except for Siyar, who is Siyar Abū al-Ḥakam as mentioned in al-Bukhārī's narration, and likewise by al-Ṭaḥāwī in "Mushkil al-Āthār" (4/385) and Aḥmad in another narration (1/419), and similarly in al-Ḥākim's narration of this ḥadīth with some abridgment in "al-Mustadrak" (4/445) and in another ḥadīth by Aḥmad (1/389), and he is trustworthy, from the men of the two Shaykhs, but it was said: he is Siyar Abū Ḥamzah, and this was favored by al-Ḥāfiẓ in "al-Tahdhīb," but Shaykh Aḥmad Shākir refuted this in his commentary on "al-Musnad" (5/257-258) and claimed that this Abū Ḥamzah has no known biography, even though he is among the men mentioned in "al-Tahdhīb," mentioned after..