furthermore, the ḥadīth of the chapter was deemed good by Imām al-Baghawī, but the commentator criticized it due to the confusion of Ibn al-Sāʾib, and he missed the authentic path of Ibn Mājah! He also missed a corroborating narration from Muḥammad ibn al-Munkadir from his father, as I will mention, which is not surprising since it is in some sources that are not among his references at the very least. However, it is surprising that he missed the path of Ibn Mājah! Then he attributed the previous narration of al-Thawrī to Aḥmad, which is an error or oversight, as the Imām did not meet al-Thawrī. He assumed that when it was said: "Sufyān narrated to us" without specifying, it was al-Thawrī, as mentioned earlier. (Note): Al-Ḥāfiẓ al-Mizzī did not include in "Tuḥfat al-Ashrāf" in the biography of "ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿUbayd ibn ʿUmayr al-Laythī al-Makkī from Ibn ʿUmar" (5/474) the previous narration of al-Nasāʾī from him, nor did he refer to it in the biography of his father ʿUbayd ibn ʿUmayr (6/7). Al-Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar failed to correct this in "al-Nukat al-Ẓirāf ʿalá al-Aṭrāf," for only He who encompasses all knowledge is free from oversight. Then I found a corroborating narration for the ḥadīth, which I had included in another book, and now it seemed appropriate to transfer it here for its corroborations after seeking guidance from Allāh ﵎. It is in the wording: "Whoever circumambulates the House [the Kaʿbah] seven times without engaging in idle talk, it is as if he has freed a slave." It was recorded by al-Bukhārī in "al-Tārīkh" (4/2/35), al-Fasawī in "al-Maʿrifah" (2/115-116), al-Mukhliṣ in "al-Fawāʾid al-Muntaqāh" (9/200/1), and al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Muʿjam al-Kabīr" (20/360/845) from Ḥurayth ibn al-Sāʾib - the muʾadhdhin for Banī Salamah - from Muḥammad ibn al-Munkadir al-Qurashī al-Taymī from his father from the Prophet ﷺ: and he mentioned it