then it was also narrated by him and al-Bukhārī in "Ṣaḥīḥ" (6/154-156, 9/193 with the explanation of "al-Fatḥ") from ʿAbd Allāh ibn al-Mubārak from Maʿmar with it. The third path: al-Ṭaḥāwī said (2/10-11): "Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl ibn Sālim al-Ṣāʾigh narrated to us, ʿUbayd Allāh ibn ʿUmar ibn Maysarah, meaning al-Qawārīrī, narrated to us, Muʿādh ibn Hishām narrated to us from his father from Qatādah from Saʿīd ibn al-Musayyib from Abū Hurayrah with it like the second narration, and it contains most of the additions that we placed between the parentheses ()." This is an authentic chain, all its men are trustworthy, the men of the two Shaykhs, except for this Muḥammad ibn Ismāʿīl. Ibn Abī Ḥātim said (3/2/190): "I heard from him in Mecca, and he is truthful." This path was attributed by al-Ḥāfiẓ (6/155) to al-Nasāʾī, Abū ʿAwānah, and Ibn Ḥibbān. The fourth path: it was narrated by al-Ḥākim (2/129) from Mubārak ibn Faḍālah from ʿUbayd Allāh ibn ʿUmar from Saʿīd al-Maqburī from Abū Hurayrah like the second narration, and he added at its end: "So Kaʿb said: Allāh and His Messenger have spoken the truth, this is indeed in the Book of Allāh, meaning in the Torah. Then he said: O Abū Hurayrah, did the Prophet ﷺ tell you which prophet it was? He said: No. Kaʿb said: It is Yūshaʿ ibn Nūn. He said: Did he tell you which city it is? He said: No. He said: It is the city of Jericho." Al-Ḥākim said: "A strange authentic ḥadīth." And al-Dhahabī agreed with him! Thus they both said, and Mubārak ibn Faḍālah is a mudallis and he narrated it with ʿanʿanah, so its isnād is not authentic, nor even good, and from this path, it was also narrated by al-Bazzār, as in "al-Bidāyah wa-al-Nihāyah" by Ibn Kathīr (1/324). Then there is a clear anomaly in this path, which is in this addition, as it includes naming him