and this al-Marwazī is a reliable narrator among the teachers of al-Bukhārī. However, what is preserved from al-Zuhrī with his isnād is mursal as previously mentioned. Yūnus also narrated it from him, except he said: from Ibn Shihāb from ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Kaʿb ibn Mālik and others that ʿĀmir ibn Mālik... the ḥadīth. It was recorded by al-Ṭabarānī (140). (Note): You have learned from what I mentioned earlier that the narration of al-ʿAdanī from ʿAbd al-Razzāq and the narration of al-Marwazī from Ibn al-Mubārak are both connected. Despite this, our esteemed brother commented on them that it was narrated by ʿAbd al-Razzāq (9741), and you have known that it is with him under the same number as mursal, so it was necessary to point this out. 11 p. 344, ḥadīth 1751. Add in the second line from the bottom: and al-Bayhaqī in "al-Ādāb" (p. 479). 12 p. 398, ḥadīth 1790. Add in the eighth line after his saying, ".. Ibn ʿUqbah, I did not recognize him": then I found him named as "Muḥammad ibn ʿUqbah" with al-Ṭabarānī in "al-Muʿjam al-Kabīr" (19/341/790) from the same route. and this Muḥammad is Ibn ʿUqbah ibn Abī Mālik al-Qurāẓī, the nephew of Thaʿlabah ibn Abī Mālik. Ibn Ḥibbān mentioned him in "al-Thiqāt" and said (3/234): "He narrates from his father and Ibn ʿAbbās. His enumeration is among the people of Medina. Muḥammad ibn Rafāʿah and Zakarīyā ibn Manẓūr narrated from him." I said: Hishām ibn Saʿd should be added to them as in the route indicated, which is a benefit not found in the books of men, and the ḥāfiẓ said about him, "unknown."