as adopted by the scholars such as Ibn Ḥajar and others, including al-Mundhirī himself. There are many ḥadīths of al-Aʿmash narrated with ʿanʿanah that al-Mundhirī authenticated, let alone others, and this is not the place to elaborate on that. Moreover, the addition by Abū Dāwūd negates that criticism because he explicitly stated that he heard them mentioning from Muṣʿab. He heard it from a group, which may include Mālik ibn al-Ḥārith initially, and the fact that they were not named does not harm because they are a group whose anonymity is compensated, as al-Sakhāwī said regarding a different ḥadīth. And Allāh knows best.

"Deliberation is from Allāh, and haste is from Satan." It was recorded by Abū Yaʿlá in his "Musnad" (3/1054) and al-Bayhaqī in "al-Sunan al-Kubrā" (10/104) through the route of al-Layth from Yazīd ibn Abī Ḥabīb from Saʿd ibn Sinān from Anas ibn Mālik (raḍiya Allāhu ʿanhu) that the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) said it: and he mentioned it. Abū Yaʿlá added: "And no one offers more excuses than Allāh, and nothing is more beloved to Allāh than praise." I say: This isnād is good, its men are trustworthy, the men of the two Shaykhs, except for Saʿd ibn Sinān, who is a good narrator as mentioned more than once. As for the statement of al-Mundhirī (2/251): "It was narrated by Abū Yaʿlá and its men are the men of the Ṣaḥīḥ," and similarly said al-Haythamī (8/19). It is one of their errors because Saʿd ibn Sinān is not among the men of the "Ṣaḥīḥ," and al-Munāwī was misled by them as he said—after mentioning that from them and mentioning that al-Suyūṭī attributed it to al-Bayhaqī alone—: "And by this, it is known that the author erred in neglecting it and preferring the narration of al-Bayhaqī." Meaning because the narration of al-Bayhaqī is defective and the narration of Abū Yaʿlá, its men are the men of the Ṣaḥīḥ. Al-Munāwī said regarding the narration of al-Bayhaqī: "Al-Dhahabī said: And Saʿd was weakened. Al-Haythamī said: He did not hear from Anas."