"this is a ḥasan ḥadīth, and Abū Sufyān's name is Ṭalḥah ibn Nāfiʿ." I said: rather, it is ṣaḥīḥ due to its forthcoming chain. Ibn Abī Ḥātim mentioned it in "al-ʿIlal" (2/284) from the narration of al-Musayyib ibn Wāḍiḥ from Abū Isḥāq al-Fazārī from al-Aʿmash with it, and from Abū Isḥāq al-Fazārī from al-Aʿmash from Abū Ṣāliḥ from Abū Hurayrah from the Prophet (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) with a similar meaning. And he said: "My father said: one of these is false." I said: the first is definitely preserved because a group of trustworthy narrators reported it from al-Aʿmash with it. Therefore, the other is the false one. Its defect is from al-Musayyib ibn Wāḍiḥ, for he has poor memory. The second: from Ṣafwān from Māʿiz al-Tamīmī from him with it without mentioning the Arabian Peninsula. It was recorded by Aḥmad (3/354) and Ibn Abī ʿĀṣim in "al-Sunnah" (Q 2/1). I said: its men are trustworthy except for this Māʿiz; Ibn Abī Ḥātim mentioned him (1/4/391) from the narration of this Ṣafwān, who is Ibn ʿAmr al-Saksakī, and he did not mention any criticism or commendation about him. As for Ibn Ḥibbān, he mentioned him in "al-Thiqāt" (3/266) from the narration of al-Zuhrī from him. The third: from Abū al-Zubayr that he heard Jābir ibn ʿAbd Allāh say: he mentioned it as mawqūf without it as well. It was recorded by Aḥmad (3/384): Ruḥ narrated to us, Ibn Jurayj narrated to us, Abū al-Zubayr narrated to us. And this isnād is mawqūf, ṣaḥīḥ according to the conditions of Muslim, and it is in the ruling of marfūʿ, and it has come as marfūʿ in the previous chains, and in this one as well in a narration by Aḥmad, he said (3/366): "Abū Nuʿaym narrated to us, Sufyān narrated to us from Abū al-Zubayr from Jābir who said: The Messenger of Allāh (ṣallá Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam) said: (he mentioned it). Wakīʿ narrated it to us from Sufyān with the same meaning." And likewise, it was recorded by Abū Yaʿlá (2/577) from the path of ʿAbd al-Raḥmān from Sufyān with it.