(2/2/49, 74, 299, 3/2/16, 274, 4/1/73, 131), and it is useful to say that he explicitly stated the transmission from him in most of these instances. This was not mentioned in his biography nor in the biography of al-Rāzī in "Tahdhīb al-Kamāl" by al-Ḥāfiẓ al-Mizzī, nor in its branches. This might be due to his weakness or because al-Bukhārī did not narrate from him in his other books for which they wrote biographies of their narrators, such as "al-Adab al-Mufrad" and others. The second way: he limits himself to attributing him to his father without naming him, saying: (Ibn Ḥumayd said), and these are their numbers: (1/2/196, 324, 2/2/218, 4/1/1/98-99). I have seen him leave it ambiguous in only two places: one of them is in (2/1/204), and the other is in (3/2/119). But regarding the first place, he clarified it elsewhere (1/2/196) as (Ibn Ḥumayd) in the same ḥadīth he narrated in the first place, so it is possible that the clarification was omitted by the copyist there. As for the other place, it can be said that the aforementioned possibility applies, and what will be mentioned shortly about the differences in copies. Then I found a third place where it was left ambiguous (3/1/16), but the corrector mentioned in his commentary on it that it appeared in a version as "Muḥammad ibn Ḥumayd," and therefore I mentioned it in the previous first instance. In conclusion, this investigation and verification revealed to me that it is customary for..