and Ibn ʿAdī said: His narrations from his father are more objectionable than what he narrated from ʿIkrimah. And the ḥāfiẓ said in "al-Taqrīb": "Truthful, but errs, and was virtuous." The rest of the men are mentioned in "al-Tahdhīb" except for ʿUmar ibn Yūnus al-Yamāmī, whom Ibn Abī Ḥātim mentioned (3/1/142-143) and narrated from Aḥmad and Ibn Maʿīn that they said: Trustworthy. Ibn ʿAsākir also recorded it (9/307/1) through the route of Ibn Aḥmad and others from Wahb with it. He was followed by Ibrāhīm ibn Marzūq, who informed us through ʿUmar ibn Yūnus with it. The fourth: from al-Walīd ibn Muḥammad al-Mawqarī from al-Zuhrī from ʿAlī ibn al-Ḥusayn ... (thus in the original indicating that the dots signify an omission) from ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib with it. It was recorded by al-Tirmidhī (4/310) who said: "A strange ḥadīth from this perspective." I say: And this al-Walīd is abandoned, accused of lying. It was also recorded by Ibn ʿAsākir (13/1) from him, and through the route of ʿIṣmah ibn Muḥammad al-Anṣārī, who informed us through Yaḥyá ibn Saʿīd al-Anṣārī from Saʿīd ibn al-Musayyib from ʿAlī ibn al-Ḥusayn ibn ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib from his father from his grandfather ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib with it. I say: And this isnād is connected, but ʿIṣmah ibn Muḥammad is a liar who fabricates ḥadīth, as Ibn Maʿīn said. 2 - As for the ḥadīth of Anas, there are two routes from him: