"we removed four ḥadīths that I realized were not in line with our criteria ... and the second of them was brought to my attention by some of our fellow students, both in writing and verbally; to them goes the credit and thanks." Similarly, what you see in the introduction to the new edition of the first volume of "al-Ḍaʿīfah" in response to such baseless claims on one hand, and to explain the reason for retracting some opinions and judgments, which this unjust person considers a contradiction, on the other hand, review it; for it is very important. And similarly ... and similarly ... which is difficult to enumerate. Then we say to you: what is the difference between your accusation and if someone were to say to you: without doubt or hesitation, you are a spy among the Muslims, and from the enemies of Islam like the Jews or others; to corrupt their beliefs and cause confusion among the general populace, with what you spread in the works attributed to you, which suggest that there are those behind you supporting you in misguidance and attacking the imams and preservers of Islam, like your statement in the book "al-Tawḥīd" by Ibn Khuzaymah: that it is a book of shirk, your weakening of the Imam of the Sunnah, Ḥammād ibn Salamah, and your declaring Sheikh al-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah and those who follow his path as disbelievers, all of this is spread in the aforementioned works, especially the commentary on "Dafʿ al-Shubah." If someone said this to you, what would be your response? Whatever your answer may be, it is our argument against you. In conclusion of this section, I draw the readers' attention to a recorded tape titled "Die in Your Rage" by the esteemed brother Dr. Nāṣir al-ʿUmar; in it is the sufficient explanation in